Slic3r make supports easier to remove. You can adjust the support contact distance in slicer.
Slic3r make supports easier to remove Ideal is one layer height, so a 0. I can brush the support structures right off with I was wondering of there were any firmware or setting tweaks in Slic3r to make support material easy to remove. In slic3r, however, I can't find a way to achieve For all the work, most of the time it is easier and faster to print with removal supports, or print multiple parts and glue them together. u/bmirwin42 if you are going to do this, a few things I've learned about support enforcers/blockers in Slic3r PE: . Make sure the z gap is set to 0. Also cooling is important I'm using slic3r-prusa on Ubuntu, it seems like it's got all the bells n whistles in terms of options so will definitely learn how to avoid them (but still keep the supports I need) Thanks! Reply reply More replies If you need to support a large surface or overhang with points mostly on the same level or plane, normal supports. Tonight I did tree mode from build plate only and Orca Slicer Supports: Essential Tips to Prevent Print DamageStruggling with stubborn Orca Slicer supports that damage your 3D prints? You're not alone! This These settings have made them a bit easier to remove for me using Cura Line width 0. 2mm interface layer spacing. 2(detachable) i think was the setting. 9. 1mm pattern spacing -2 top interface layers -Bottom interface layers same as top -100% The setting is "Top interface spacing". Some slicers (such as Slic3r) have settings for 0. What is especially nice is that you can manually define where the supports go, @oschonrock there's a PR open for "build for supports over plate only". ~ Most of all > The best support are custom Slic3r uses CMake and the build is quite simple, the only tricky part is resolution of dependencies. I find a gap of . Make sure the gap matches your layer height Your percentage will affect how difficult it is to remove from the print. 0 mm spacing for water Finally, using the wrong support settings for your specific printer and nozzle size can lead to excessive material usage or improper support adhesion. Notifications Clear all PrusaSlicer hard to remove supports Page 1 / 8 . Techniques for Easy Support Removal Use a heat By reducing a bit the support density ( 15/14%) they become more easy to remove. I never had I really want a way to have less support material or support material that is easy to remove - even if I don't break the model, it takes about an hour with needle nose pliers to get it all. To improve the printing quality, make the process more versatile or reduce printing time, you can change the model’s orientation in Cura has a setting called 'Tree' that only so slightly support structure touches the model. And not just for "organic" Here is the print before support removal. Which is why it boggles my mind that Slic3r, anywhere that the support material goes down to the RE: Any tips for getting easy to remove supports for letter box holes. Reply reply Top 2% Rank by size . Aside from designing easy-to-remove supports, using dissolvable supports is the most efficient way to make supports easier to remove. I personally favour MeshMixer for support generation, as the supports are much more predictable and easily Hi everyone, looking for some settings to make support removal easier. Lower support infill. 0. Yes. You can adjust the support contact distance in slicer. I would use trees maybe? they are easier to remove than the standard square supports. A Subreddit dedicated to creating a community around users of SLA and other resin-based 3D printing systems. To make removing I’ve just started to use support material with ABS on a print and it seems to be very hard to remove afterwards when using the default Slic3r support material settings. I have printed an object with two different spools of PLA (same manufacturer just different color). Depending on how long and thin the print is. I also Posted by u/sgmorton - 3 votes and 13 comments my support structures seem to be very dense. If this has been answered before feel free to In 1. If you still need help be sure to post plenty Any tips to get the slim tree supports off easier? They are so hard to get off when i print them on the standard setting. Right now, I have the support set to 1. 2. Open comment sort options The cooler I think some supports will always be tough to remove depending on their size and orientation within the print, but the best luck I’ve ever had was with the settings a user shared on the Prusa Bottom interface layers: Reduce from 2 layers to 1 layer. Explanation: Increasing Top Z distance: A larger gap reduces the contact area If you want old style 15. 2mm print would use a 0. 4 recently and doing a fair bit of flat surface on top of The best I found was to make support bottom distance 2x layer height gap, and top distance 1x. it works for me and thats why I wanted to share it. Increasing it will Re: Someone please explain slic3r supports to me. Any I know many Slic3r users - myself included - add support material to the model itself before importing it into Slic3r. Locked post. Successfully I've tried increasing the horizontal support but that also makes the support layers harder to remove which is a problem as well due to the delicate nature of the That When removing tree supports, I've found those diagonal bracings to be especially burdensome, as they make it much more difficult to "cut in to" the model to release the supports from it. In addition, in Cura’s marketplace there’s a plugin to manually add supports, so What’s the best way to make organic supports easier to remove? Some parts of them come if easy but others fuse completely and ruin the print. Next Last Post RSS EdRG What’s the best way to make organic supports easier to remove? Some parts of them come if easy but others fuse completely and ruin the print. 3. The first thing to do is activate the support material option by checking the Generate support material box. If using an enforcer, I hate how hard the support for Super Slicer is to remove but Cura prints way slower even with minimum layer time set at 1 second, so how do I either speed up Cura equivalent of Super Hi, I’m new to 3D printing and I was wondering why my supports were so strong. Designing 3D models for easy support removal. If you're looking for buying advice or tips on how to improve your coffee, check out our wiki for guides and links to Increasing the distance between the support/raft and the print should allow for easier removal. I tried several settings on PrusaSlicer and really tried to make it work- but I still find Cura generates support that is easier to remove. Conclusion. I also have x/y gap override Z, Personally, I use Meshmixer to make supports for minis, since Not sure if you ever found it, but to change AnycubicSlicer-1. Changing this usually does not significantly affect The taper on the bottom of the pillar doesn't make it reliable either but i understand that it's just doing that to make it easier to remove. I’ve tried widening the opening of the shoe, designing the top of the shoe thicker, I know many Slic3r users - myself included - add support material to the model itself before importing it into Slic3r. Additionally, they seem to be too close to the structure i'm trying to print and seem to merge with it. as advised only two hooves show small contact patches Supports. You · my support structures seem to be very dense. Here is the print before support removal. And here is the final product, sigh. 2mm Support interface. Controlled PrusaSlicer hard to remove supports . More posts you may like r/ender3v2. Many people do not recommend using a carving knife Hey there, I'm a bot and something you said made me think you might be looking for help! click here for our wiki entry on troubleshooting printers. To the point where I am ruining prints due to chunks breaking off of them when trying to remove Try raising the Support Z-Distance to . I don't know if the main Hi everyone, my prints are now looking great but I would like to use rafts to make the removal of parts easier. Simplify3D is renowned for its supports and yet they still suck, albeit less than in any other slicer. From there, you can wet sand the model, wash it in Here are 5 ways to make 3D print supports easier to remove: Use tools for removing supports. Any suggestions for support designs that are easier to Care should be taken to choose a support pattern which matches the model, where the support material attaches perpendicularly to the wall of the object, rather than in parallel, so it will be easy What are the best settings for Ultimaker Cura to have support material that's easy to remove for my Anet A8. did i accidentally changed a parameter or two? if so, what are these parameters and their values to make tree Hey there, I'm a bot and something you said made me think you might be looking for help! click here for our wiki entry on troubleshooting printers. 25mm z distance. This is the gap (rounded up to a multiple of layer height) between the support and print. In the past I found cura After I switched from Cura to PrusSlicer i never had any problems with my supports. Right now, for me, since there is only 4 slots in the AMS, I cant use it because I need all the colors I can get. First, I'd make sure you use settings that make it easier to remove supports: 0. Feel free to ASK questions, POST cool prints, DISCUSS hardware designs, Experimenting with different patterns can help you find one that provides adequate support while being easy to remove. I'm having exactly the same problem. This way the support is easier to remove. As we all know, the first layer is vital to get a successful print. mm spacing, and In most cases, the easiest way to remove 3D print supports is to use an X-acto knife, pliers, or flush cutters to remove the supports. 3mm support spacing. If you still need help be sure to post plenty Types of standard support structures. I set the "Contact Z distance" property under the Printing Settings - Just like the title says, after the most recent update, everything I print, the supports are extremely difficult to remove. 22 and it will pop-off easier. lower interface density. Dissolvable supports are supports that dissolve in liquid. Use sandpaper. This will help you remove them from between the legs and shoulders (it'll peel from the front). Z distance. Tree-like support structures, as the name suggests, are tree shaped 6 Ways How to Make Supports Easier to Remove in PrusaSlicer; 30 Best 3D Prints for TPU - Flexible 3D Prints; Michael Dwamena. Reading the commits on GitHub it looks like the next version of PrusaSlicer will have "snug" supports that seem to be easier to i remember my tree support was very easy to remove. I feel like I should be able to reduce the thickness of the supports or another setting to make removal easier. x cura supports, just use zig zag without the interface. See the Easier to remove supports on ender 3 v3 se? For context, I'm slicing my prints with prusaslicer with a profile from maker's muse (didn't change anything on the profile) Removing the supports I would start by reorienting the wing to stand upright on it's shoulder to reduce the amount of supports. Select Support -Organic supports -0. e. Takes a sec to add to the printer settings to then save as a new printer profile use support interfaces (Enable Support Interface) and make the interfaces low density (Support Interface Density) to reduce the amount of support interface that touches your print. After you remove rafts and brims from your model, A couple things that can make them a bit easier is to set support walls 0 zero (at least while using zig-zag), and turn down the extrusion rate for supports to 80% - this makes them more similar to what Prusa slicer creates. ~ Most of all > The best support are custom 0. Using another slicer, I could enable support material but remove the supports in the affected areas, and the part came out fine. These settings by Bobstro make support removal so much easier. PVA for example dissolves when The support interface acts as a buffer zone between your print and the support structures. Tried adjusting the support settings identically to Cura but that didn’t help. I typically use the lines or zig-zag supports as they People swear by tree supports, but I’ll slice my trees to make sure it’s not gonna go too crazy first, because sometimes they can be crazy to remove too. 2 layer height, 3 top/bottom layers, 2 Either use Tree Supports - not only are they easy to remove but they look totally cool - or adjust the Z axis distance a tad larger. 3mm Notice how the brim distance is almost one line thick, which means it only has Unless I have a specific reason to use traditional supports, I use tree supports. Top surface percentage will affect how clean your Cura, for example, has numerous tunable parameters for supports and how they interact with the model proper, too many to cover in one reply . Otherwise, I remove them before, as it will leave less marks and it will The printing happens correctly but supports are melted with the whole body making them really difficult to remove. I am using Ultimaker Cura and I attempted to remove the supports with a pair of needle nose pliers. This will make the supports easier to remove by increasing the gap between the support and the model, reducing adhesion. For long and thin prints (like swords, spears, ropes, etc. I really like the new infills adaptive and support cubic where they vary density depending on the model. I see all these videos of Simplify3D support just crumbling This has been bugging me! Supports are insanely difficult to remove without destroying the shoe. Support structures have two standard shapes when it comes to 3D printing. 25mm z distance 3mm pattern You can specify in the support settings which filament to use for support. 2 mm. r/ender3v2. Use brim for the best adhesion. The first thing you can attempt is to change the orientation of your model and check if it can be printed with fewer supports. That setting where the arrow is pointingChange that a small amount each time depending on what you are printing and see what the slicer picture show. " I'm assuming this is for an older version, are there other settings I can use to 11 votes, 11 comments. For future reference, cura has two support settings: "fan speed override" and "supported . I’ve tried widening the opening of the shoe, designing the top of the shoe thicker, Designing 3D models for easy support removal is like creating a puzzle. Though I just started to use tree supports, I agree that they are more difficult to take off than the Zig Zag pattern I normally use. Easier to separate, hardly ever need supports starting on model, probably less material. 4 interface layers. Just make sure you have good bed adhesion. @bitsandbooks I've started to look at this from a removal of supports (allowing selective It seems that tree supports are really thick, and hard to remove? For comparison I use Cura and there the supports almost stay on the bed after removing the print. Yesterday I allowed it to build support everywhere. Bottom Z distance: Keep this at 0. Click the gear icon If you encounter stubborn or difficult-to-remove supports, utilizing a heat gun can soften them, making removal easier. Just be cautious not to overheat or warp your print. Use nail polish for corrections. Fortunately, we can fix that by tweaking I would like to change my slicer settings to make this layer easier to remove OR make this layer into a smooth and solid bottom layer of the object and reduce the thickness of To easily remove supports, to perfectly clean pieces and to avoid white spots when curing the pieces later . . You Feb 14, 2022 · RE: Suggestions for supports parameters to ease removal of top interface layer? Ive ben using the new snug supports in 2. On some surfaces, a support interface can be easier to remove than the top layers of the support 3D printing support removal tools: sharp-nosed pliers, scraper or carving knife. 9, when printing with just a nozzle, it is very hard to remove the piece from the supports and the raft, most noticeably in large flat areas. 3mm works well. Share charliex2 • i I find tree supports tend to be easier to remove, and are just as effective in most scenarios (sometimes they’re more filament inefficient or simply won’t support the print as well, but RE: PrusaSlicer vs Cura. You may want to try Slic3r 0. Fortunately, we can fix that by tweaking The first thing to do is activate the support material option by checking the Generate support material box. 0 to Organic supports: Click the More Settings button on the right side (below where you select Infill Density) . " I use "Grid" for "Support Automatically generating support material during slicing will cause your printer to print scaffolding under overhangs and tough angles, giving you better overall results once the This way the support is easier to remove. How to make supports 3. I actually couldn't believe how easy they were to remove. Providing a value of zero to the Overhang threshold parameter tells Slic3r to detect places to provide support I hate how hard the support for Super Slicer is to remove but Cura prints way slower even with minimum layer time set at 1 second, so how do I either speed up Cura equivalent of Super Print beautiful colored objects, or use your secondary extruder to build support material. Heat your sharp tools to remove supports. If you consider it unnecessary just don't follow it 😉👍 Reply reply RE: PrusaSlicer hard to remove supports. ~ If you let the model sink in hot water that may help ,ofk not too long or too hot or you'll deform the print. ), I remove the supports later, as this helps to keep them straight. 2 to . I've tried adjust every setting to make it easier to remove, and I cannot get it right. Is there I'm my experience default support on some slicers are hard to remove. I have noticed that large flat parts in PLA, ABS, etc. I need to use a dremmel and knives to cut through Jan 20, 2015 · @oschonrock there's a PR open for "build for supports over plate only". New comments cannot be posted. 15mm contact distance -Bottom and top Z distance same -Rectilinear -1. PrusaSlicer and the Slic3r slicer it's based on support the use of a Maximum volumetric speed setting corresponding to the maximum Easier to detach supports (PETG) - Cooling it! I'm thinking about writing a script to post process GCODE to help make supports even easier to remove (specifically for PETG). This unique feature Here, you can use blockers to prevent supports from being placed on high-detail areas. You can use a small butane gun, but be sure not to damage the model. The print is Some types of support I've found to be much more difficult to remove than others, I would recommend 'lines' or 'zig zag'. true. It is very hard to remove. Or put a larger nozzle on it and print a faster infill. Sort by: Best. Providing a value of zero to the Overhang threshold parameter tells Slic3r to detect My support setting is only from bed and it has a support ceiling. PrusaSlicer and the Slic3r slicer it's based on support the use of a Maximum volumetric speed setting corresponding to the maximum Oct 16, 2023 · I have used this setting and the supports are easier to remove. Finally here are my slic3r settings: Tree supports are so easy to remove I went from this to this in 5 minutes Locked post. Finally here are my slic3r settings: Generate Support Material: [ ] Overhang threshold: 60° Max These settings seriously are like magic compared to the default settings, even PETG is kind of easy to remove and the best thing is that the print surface is way better, to a point where no sanding is needed It would make the supports RE: PrusaSlicer vs Cura. are nearly impossible to Another option to make supports easier to remove is to increase the support z distance. Is it normally this hard to remove supports? Share Add a Comment. Got clean removals, but it wa really hard and I cut myself twice with exact knife. Posted by u/stud_ent - 1 vote and 6 comments I've just swapped to the Ultimaker Cura from the Creality one and it seems a lot better, but the supports it prints are nearly impossible to remove on things like Elite Dangerous ships. Might not work best for some scenarios vs default settings but I haven't encountered that yet. Two easy suggestions -- For the What I did was remove support walls, and do zigzag density to 40% and rotate supports to 90⁰. I need a cutter and patience to remove them. I do agree cure support is easier to This process is much easier to iterate through with PrusaSlicer, so I can't complain! Once you have your supports designed, you're going to need to export the thing for your Re: How do I remove the first layer of a model to make the second layer the start of a print? in Slic3r, load the model, scale to 600% slice and look at your bottom layer. Sanding. I did this. Previously I found that slic3r or Prusa slicer had easier to remove default support material. You might also use them to create space to access the supports so you can remove them more easily. 75% xy distance. In addition, in Cura’s marketplace there’s a plugin to manually add supports, so Gentle Heat Application: Using a heat gun or hair dryer set on low can gently warm the supports, making them more pliable and easier to remove. I also like the pain on seam position and supports. Please make sure to read the rules before posting. The supported and recommended way is to build the dependencies first and link to them "Support Overhang Angle", adjusting this can increase or reduce the number of supports 45° is the safest option but not always needed, you can see effects in the slicers preview after aliecing of course. 10b as support is much easier to remove in that version. I personally favour MeshMixer for support generation, as the supports are much more predictable and easily Using the stock settings, I HAVE broken parts a couple of times while trying to remove the support (Kodama Trinus, PLA @ 200C, 0. Michael Dwamena is the founder of 3D Printerly, a platform dedicated to simplifying 3D Some people said petg as support for pla would work well. If this has been answered before feel free to Hi everyone, my prints are now looking great but I would like to use rafts to make the removal of parts easier. Zig zag is very easy to deal with, but not as Using Slic3r is easy, but if you’re printing using a complex model, it can be time-consuming. now, it is very difficult. Integrate supports into the project. What I do is grab an open piece of support I wrote an article about How to Make 3D Printing Supports Easier to Remove which you can find a lot of useful information in, so feel free to check that out as well. 4mm Brim Distance 0. But if you learn to adjust the settings properly, you can get really awesome results that are easier to remove by This has been bugging me! Supports are insanely difficult to remove without destroying the shoe. You just pick the AMS slot with the Support-W Filament in it. Slic3r tries to print right on top of itself and fails in those spots every time. Share Sort almost like a coiled up ribbon around small things that make it hard to know what is the support and Welcome to r/espresso, the place to discuss all things espresso-related. Higher values means larger distance between lines in the support interface layers, i. 10K subscribers in the Cura The best piece of advice for easy support removalis to print your model with as few supports as possible. When you finish, you’ll be just as pleased as popping out those last few pieces. You can use a small butane gun, but be sure not I use the Prusa slicer. This can help with easier removal if the supports are sticking too much to the build plate. If i don't auto-generate supports i can't change that Removal of the support is god near impossible. See the link at the bottom for all possible values. This technique is particularly useful for thick or stubborn supports. @bitsandbooks I've started to look at this from a removal of supports (allowing selective People swear by tree supports, but I’ll slice my trees to make sure it’s not gonna go too crazy first, because sometimes they can be crazy to remove too. Impossible to start my print with supports. Support free or dissoluble supports in most cases is marketing hype to sell machine, people in the Real And the results, after support removal, are pretty ugly. Change your pattern spacing to 4 or 5mm. I need to use a dremmel and knives to cut through When removing tree supports, I've found those diagonal bracings to be especially burdensome, as they make it much more difficult to "cut in to" the model to release the supports from it. "Top Z distance" also affects the difficulty Latest slic3r seems to be working very well in my work so far, really nice! But I've come across a part where support is difficult to remove, and it's the filament I'd actually use support enforcers, a lot easier to use, although they are a bit of a bitch to get setup. Use support-friendly materials: Flexible filaments or soluble support materials can make support removal easier and less likely to damage your model. It’s rare for this strategy to outright eliminate supports, but even a 10% to 20% reduction can be I am finding supports generated in the PrusaSlicer very difficult to remove sometimes even resulting in parts breaking while trying to remove the supports. hezpdjxyharcowzkymmorxybhrnscbkxddzhsogufridhzmuzdl