What happens after minor revision. Aug 13, 2023 · Thank you for sharing your experience.

What happens after minor revision I have revised the paper according to the referees' comments. It is not recommended to wait until the last minute to complete the revision, particularly in cases of minor revision. One reviewer's comment was for acceptance, while the other reviewer wanted clarification about the novelty of the results. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision Minor changes will usually be assessed directly by the editor; If significant revisions were requested, the editor will usually return the manuscript to the original reviewers (unless they opted out of this) Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh review is sought. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. Sep 15, 2022 · A reject after revision is uncommon but it happens, what were the main reasons from the author’s side as well as the editor/ reviewers side of the story? I submitted a minor revision for my Aug 12, 2019 · I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Dec 15, 2019 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Major revision: The paper could be accepted after some significant changes. I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. 0 for a big new feature release. I am trying to think ahead about what happens after the paper is accepted. The status stayed "with the editor" for around 4 months and suddenly, I get a rejection for my 'Minor revisions’ means that a manuscript only has to undergo small changes and improvements before it can be published in an academic journal. After the first review, it came back for a major revision. Accept: The Action Editor has decided that the paper is suitable for publication in its current form. Throughout the whole revision process, authors should bear in mind that even a minor revision does not guarantee acceptance after revision. After making the necessary adjustments, I resubmitted the revised manuscript on the 21st of November. Sep 29, 2014 · Instances of this decision are also rather rare. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. Minor revisions will include formatting or writing suggestions and are typically issues you can easily address. I mean, just for V 20 there are 20. When you are home, you will need to rest but you can resume your normal diet as soon as you feel like you can. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. The buyer requested a revision after almost 3 days, and the counter did not resume the one day that I had left - instead it just showed LATE because the original due date had passed. 01. Overal After a month in peer review, i received comments of FIVE reviewers with a message from the academic editor that it needed a Major revision as reviewers had serious issues with the manuscript. Feb 20, 2018 · I had a 3-day order and delivered after 2 days, so I naturally had 1 more day left just in case of a revision. Sometimes, it will specify "minor revision" or "major revision". Does this mean it got sent to reviewers or the editor is evaluating it? Any experience here? It’s an Elsevier journal. Jul 8, 2019 · After resubmitting my revised manuscript on 20th of June, the status changed to 'under review' after only 4 days and then after 6 days (on 30th of June) it changed to 'required reviews completed. May 8, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status has changed from ‘Required Review Completed’ to ‘Decision in Process. Generally, reviewer comments are there to strengthen the paper's quality, your research, or both. See full list on cwauthors. There is a deadline to submit the manuscript revision. 2. I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. We performed analysis of revision Jun 30, 2024 · I received a major revision in March with comments from Reviewer 1 only. Acceptance with minor revisions. Recruiting new reviewers to evaluate a minor revision is very non-standard. ) I read the manuscript again and again and corrected a few A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). A minor revision is close to a contract to publish the paper if certain changes are made. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. To date, the status is “under review”. Timeline It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may Dec 22, 2015 · The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". Dec 13, 2016 · Two out of three reviewers rejected the paper I had submitted saying that it is not of high scientific content. 7. Contents The meaning of a 'desk-rejected' paperWhat to do if your paper is desk-rejectedThe meaning of 'revise and Oct 6, 2021 · Hello. In Elsevier, particularly, before this happens, Nov 12, 2020 · I submitted my article earlier this year in January. Dec 19, 2019 · Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. During this period, we got a chance to make minor revision. One reviewer thinks the article is a good fit for the journal; the other does not. A-accept (almost never after the first review round) B-minor revisions required (no further formal external peer-review round required, reviewer will not see the revision, editor makes decision) C-revise & re-review (reviewer invited for re-review if revision is submitted) Accept after Minor Revisions: The paper can in principle be accepted after revision based on the reviewer’s comments. It is just guessing. "major revision": The revised paper will require a second round of reviews. The 1s rund review was also long 16 months. Although the eagerness to have the surgery completed is understandable, there is an extensive pre-surgery process and patience-requiring post-op revision Aug 13, 2023 · Thank you for sharing your experience. However, it is good to remember that an ‘accept with minor revisions’ decision does not guarantee acceptance. The third number can refer to a "really minor" version, or revision. ED1 said major, ED2 said minor. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. I would write to the editor politely and ask them if the reviewers were the same, and if not, why additional reviews were sought given the positive outcome from the first round. After a while, I received a message stating that the revisions I made have been accepted by the reviewers and I was only being asked to proofread the manuscript again to correct potential mistakes. Jul 26, 2018 · My case report, which was edited by Editage, received a minor revision request by a journal. e. I have submitted my paper to a Sage journal. Capsular contracture most often leads to implant revision surgery for aesthetic or reconstructive purposes. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. After submitting the minor revision, the statutes changed to the pending editorial decision for 1 month. Often you will receive a message (either via email or on the journal's submission site) from the editor that summarizes the reviewer comments and either outright rejects the paper or asks for a revised manuscript. Once the decision is approved, you will receive your decision letter. All of the sudden the statues changed to the revised version review from yesterday. As an editor you are faced with many different view from reviewers. Sometimes it is indeed the case. Thus, authors should proceed with an invitation for a minor revision with the same care as they approach an invitation for a major revision. Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Reject: The journal will not publish the paper. As the author of a manuscript which has received an accept with minor revisions decision, you are to be congratulated. SO, after incorporating and submitting minor revisions, the editor decision on next day shows: Accept after after minor revision. What sometimes happens is that reviewer recommendations diverge widely. ' Is 8 days a long time to provide a final decision especially since the reviewers' responses were rather quick? Thank you for your answer. 0 for the first real release, 1. According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), most patients go home on the same day or in 1 to 2 days after MISS. (I wasn't explicitly asked to send my paper for language editing. 00, 20. After the cornea has been reshaped, the corneal flap is meticulously repositioned onto the corneal tissue. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Only a few minor changes or clarifications are needed. Feb 17, 2022 · After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Apr 9, 2023 · I submitted an article to a certain top IEEE transaction journal, and after a year and a half of peer review, it was finally rejected. 5. 为什么收到第一轮审稿意见的时候有编辑“accept after minor revision”,第二轮修改后进入pending editor decision, 第一轮的编辑意见不见了，那以前的小修后 There's never been a situation like Revision Zero's, so we don't know. But the third reviewer suggested "publish after minor revision. Jul 1, 2018 · Eventually, the manuscript will be accepted or rejected. If it is taking long process of review time (more than 3 weeks) after minor revision then any revised decisions can be expected. Perhaps deadlines for revisions are also to put a bit of pressure to authors to actually perform the changes in a reasonable time. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. TIP: journals have different revision deadlines which vary from as little as a few weeks to three months depending on the revisions that need to be made. Aug 25, 2021 · I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. Mar 5, 2021 · Hello, everyone. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. Once the corresponding author approves these, your article is compiled into an issue of the journal and is published in its final form. But this depends how efficient the journal is. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. 02, 20. After round 2, ED1 said OK, ED2 said reject. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. I submitted after the revision and received a reply stating that my paper could be accepted after a minor revision (provided the reviewer's queries are addressed). The journal clearly said that the paper was accepted, subject to minor amendments and even went on to mention tentative publication dates. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". 01, 20. Revise your paper. Dec 6, 2022 · Usually, the first two numbers respresent a major and a minor version, i. " The remaining 40 fell into the "revise and resubmit" or "major revision" or some similar May 30, 2017 · The editor will make the final decision, not the reviewers. This short delay can allow time for the emotional response that may interfere with successful revision to subside. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the case. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal in January 2020. Mostly it happens that the reviewers "ask a lot of questions and mandate to include or modify something on your paper" after receiving a revised version of a manuscript, and this is done "simply Jan 1, 2023 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. 1 for some important bugfixes and minor new features, 2. One-and-a-half months after submitting the revised version, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed and has remained so for more than three weeks. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. Reconsider after Major Revisions: The acceptance of the manuscript would depend on the revisions. Authors are given five days for minor revisions. " The paper is open for revisions. The same thing happens with one of my friends three times. It has been now 3 months since I sent for revision. I was awarded substantial, but I don't have to do any additional experimental work (basically just need to strengthen the narrative thread through the thesis, which will involve some minor rewrites, mostly to the intro and conclusions sections) and the the revision, you may choose to re- invite the original reviewers for another look or proceed to a final decision. Aug 4, 2021 · The ‘normal’ procedure is that once an editor received peer reviews of (at least) two reviewers you receive the request to respond (and send a revised manuscript). After the surgery, you may have mild pain and soreness as you start to move around. Revision: If your review team asks for revisions, please review their comments carefully to avoid unnecessary rounds of revisions. I have given reminder to editor, let me see what happens at the end. The editor agrees, the decision is rendered, and the manuscript proceeds to the revision stage or is accepted and forwarded to production to be prepared for publication. Take the list of comments and suggestions and group them into categories, and then identify which require a minor revision and which require a major revision. At this point, the referee(s) may recommend acceptance of your paper, or request further revisions. Jan 17, 2023 · accept aft. Aug 7, 2015 · As we revise the paper, it sometimes bugs me that the paper is not quite perfect. The latter happened to me once as a guest editor. The author needs to provide a point-by-point response or provide a rebuttal if The decision on a manuscript is usually based on more than one review, often two. Dec 24, 2019 · I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. After submitting their manuscripts to academic journals, authors receive one of several editorial decisions: 'desk reject', 'revise and resubmit', 'major revisions', 'minor revisions', or 'paper accepted. Revision Deadline. Also, the second round took 8 months. But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". I'd say maybe 40 were "minor revision. Does my paper stand a chance of acceptance after revision? Why is it open for revisions when majority 2/3 of the reviewers had rejected it? Just thinking back the past decade, I've had about 90 publication submissions. Of these, I estimate that five were rejected (either desk rejected or reviewed and rejected). It happens in less than 10% of submissions. Recently. 05. Post-Surgery Recovery and Care. The comments were entirely new. Oct 13, 2020 · I had submitted my paper to a reputed journal. And now the revision is already 3 months. Receiving this output from good journals is very rare. If you review a manuscript and struggle to formulate your feedback to reflect a 'minor revisions' verdict, look no further: get inspired by explanations, sample comments and examples! Contents When to decide Nov 16, 2015 · Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. Whisper of the Worm and Outbreak Perfected both had similar setups requiring multiple runs of their associated runs to acquire/complete the catalysts. 00 So, the questions I have is, is it generally better to get the latest minor revision? Jan 8, 2021 · I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. 3 months later of submitting the revised (R1) version, I have received again the review report for Minor revision further required. Even the best papers could sometimes receive a major revision or rejection after an initial minor revision request. There are things like minor typos, grammar, and even some more major flaws like parts where the phrasing should be improved. After peer review, the editor makes a decision based on the reviewer(s) recommendation(s) and their own assessment, which can be any of the following: A-accept (almost never after the first review round) B-minor revisions required (no further formal external peer review round required, editor makes decision) C-revise & re-review I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. . Accept with minor revisions: The journal will publish the paper after the author to make small corrections. Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually happens in a certain order, however an individual submission can skip a phase, or return back to an earlier phase, depending on Editor actions. Accept with minor amendments: The paper has been through the peer review process and the Action Editor has decided that it would be suitable for publication after some relatively minor changes. The decision letter should specify these points for You might expect that since it is a minor revision, then it will be accepted almost immediately. Often reviews point in the same direction and may be differ by one providing a major revision and one a minor. After 10 months, I received a major revision and a minor revision decision by the [two] reviewers. At the 1st review, the referees' have written positive statement. If you do not think you will be able to return a revised manuscript in the allotted time tell the editor immediately. However, little is known about which operation is chosen when revision surgery has to be performed. What actually happens with the manuscript depends on the editor and editorial policy. However, The status on main profile shows minor revisions, why it doesn’t show accepted? Even we already incorporated and It happens, unfortunately, but it is poor editorship. After 50 days of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested” and that the new version was required within one month. Sep 24, 2019 · After three rounds of review and revision, why is the status "with editor" again? What does the status "With an Editor" mean after two rounds of revision? Aug 16, 2024 · First Decision: After peer review, your review team will recommend a decision to our Sage Open Editorial Office. You will have the opportunity to improve your paper taking into account the expert insights of the reviewers and the editor. Minor Revision The manuscript is suitable for publication but needs some minor adjustments. There're three reviewers, one decided recommend acceptation, other recommended a minor revision and the last one recommended a major revision. Still no news. I am anxious if there is any problem Your revised article and response to the referees will normally be sent back to one or more of the referees (minor revisions may be checked by our in-house staff). Based on this, it may take about two-three weeks for this round of review and for the final decision. Then I received a reject letter from the new editor. Revision It is highly likely that, if your paper is not rejected, you will be asked to revise it. 0 for example. We have revised the manuscript again responding to all the third reviewer highlighted points (some points are not responsible for that reason we submitted a rebuttal letter to the editor before sending the revision). This means it’s going to be a second round of revision. This natural healing process doesn’t require any sutures, making for a smoother recovery period. 0. It all depends on the editor to adjudge the comments base on the merit of the paper. Mar 13, 2022 · Minor revision: The paper is almost accepted. In the second round, I received a minor revision with comments from both Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 2, which I addressed thoroughly. One of the new reviewers made several rounds of incorrect comments. Shortly after the viva, the PGRE team will send you the list of these corrections, which your examiners will have created. After 4 months received a review report with minor revisions. Around the end of last year, the journal changed its chief editor who was responsible for my article. They are set out as a way to schedule and organize the journal operations. The catalysts became unobtainable one those missions were vaulted and at least initially those who already had them but h Dec 17, 2024 · The academic editor gave his decision as: The paper is accepted after minor reviews. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. But editor-in-chief rejects it. What happens when you receive the decision letter? After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. Now, in the third round, I have received another minor revision with comments from Reviewer 3. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. And there are some differences between institutions - my university uses the terms minor and substantial classifications for amendments. To facilitate a faster review Three reviewers reviewed that manuscript, and their comments seemed like minor revision. But even when I got the “full revision” or “major revision” message followed by a list of 10 instructions about how to resubmit the revised manuscript, I viewed this as an eventual acceptance after revising with the reviewers suggestions and concerns in mind. Speed Mar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. If the referee(s) are not satisfied with the changes made or […] Nov 6, 2020 · I recently resubmitted a manuscript after making major revisions. The viva is becoming more common in Australia, but most people will still get a written report from the examiners. Nov 5, 2024 · When your manuscript is accepted for publication, the corresponding author receives the proofs of your manuscript. The vast majority of minor revisions are ultimately accepted for publication, while many more major revisions are later found unacceptable and rejected. For the first round, I recieved a major revision and for the next two rounds, I received minor revisions. com If the previous editorial decision was B (minor revisions), only the editor will see the author responses and will make a decision based on them. May 20, 2015 · Now it seems to be the severity of the revisions required. Jan 19, 2017 · My article was submitted to a journal last year and has undergone three rounds of reviews. Authors have 45 days to revise and resubmit. 1 is just a very small bugfix to 1. The editors of the Journal of Monetary Economics have concluded that your paper contains a contribution that is publishable when a small list of specified revisions is successfully executed. After 5 months I received a "Major revision". Feb 22, 2021 · I got a review from a reputed Elsevier journal. 1. Whilst there isn’t a requirement to undertake another viva, the ‘Pass’ element of the outcome is only valid when all of the required corrections have been completed. I Sep 23, 2015 · Is it common for a journal to reject a paper after previously accepting it? When a paper of mine was first reviewed, one of the reviewers was okay with the paper and the other one requested minor revisions. Jul 8, 2015 · Accepted pending changes (i. The Journal response: Major revision -> minor revision "Revise for Editor Only'' -> reject. Jun 18, 2020 · So anyway, I started to look on RA's site to see if there are newer revision available in case I have to remove and install and I found tons of version available. The paper was then sent to two new reviewers. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. Upon resubmission, you verify that requested changes were made and usually accept the manuscript. Rejection after peer review : Dealing with this is a key skill required of any academic. Roughly five were accept without revision. Conditional acceptance with minor revision: These articles are usually published if the revisions have been made. Mar 29, 2017 · A major revision goes back to reviewers, while the minor revision goes to the (associate) editor for a decision. minor revision or major revision) means that you have to perform the requested changes before the paper may be accepted. However, expect a slightly longer wait at this time of the year due to the approaching holiday season. I have received minor comments (only a few text corrections) from the referee who suggested major revision at the 1st review. However, I have heard nothing from the journal for 3 weeks, though I assumed I would receive a response in a few days. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Nov 11, 2017 · Accept with minor revision (comments from examiners) Accept with major revision (it goes again to the examiners, but less time for review is provided) Reject (usually unlikely; based on history) Once the thesis is accepted (either of the first three of the above), the examiner(s) comes to the students' university for viva-voice. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and gives a final approval. 04. Sep 14, 2021 · Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. ’ Could you tell me if this is bad news or good news? Meaning of Decision in Process status after two rounds of revision Jul 21, 2015 · In my experience, paper revision deadlines set out by journals are not strict. It was rather an easy comment, so I resubmitted the case report after revision immediately. – Aug 27, 2021 · "minor revision": I don't need to see the revised paper again, it's okay if the editor considers the comments sufficiently addressed/incorporated. Nov 6, 2023 · I submitted my manuscript on April 26th and I got the major revision in the first round and “accept after minor revision” in the second round. Oct 1, 2024 · Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. Apr 29, 2018 · After enduring the dissatisfaction and discomfort of an unsatisfactory rhinoplasty, many patients want their revision rhinoplasty surgery in northern NJ to be completed immediately. After allowing a short delay, it is preferable for authors to start the revision promptly . If you After getting a moderate revision for the manuscript and resubmitting it, it is possible to get moderate revision again, or minor revision, or accept directly without any further edits. A very painful situation for Mar 6, 2019 · Have you ever wondered what happens after the examiners give you feedback on your dissertation? In the UK and many other countries, this feedback is given in an oral presentation called the Viva. Nov 20, 2024 · The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Jul 10, 2016 · Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). Apr 15, 2021 · The editor gave us a major revision again. One of the referee suggested minor revision, while the other suggested major revision. After contacting him, I was told that he But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". ' Learn what these editorial decisions precisely mean, and how to react. It is rare Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing Jan 18, 2020 · After two revisions (the first major and the second minor), the Editor Assigned status means that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE) to review the second round of changes and also the manuscript as a whole. After LASIK surgery, you might experience minor discomfort and hazy vision. Then the status changed to “Decision in process”. The length of the deadline depends on the reviewer decision for the manuscript: Decision B (minor revisions) = 2 week deadline; Decision C or D (major revisions & re-review) = 8 week deadline Papers rejected after external peer review are likely to have one or more issues with the content of the paper. Mar 12, 2021 · This list will guide your revision of the paper. disc xrj hyde wnnmmdq bky npd myjdqy fyxn wegxv fik